I tend to agree. I have very little programming experience, and I used Tinderbox to analyze archival data for my dissertation. It saved me a great deal time. I tried using qualitative tools such as MAXQDA11, but in the end found Tinderbox to be much more accessible and less time-consuming. Although tutorials can be useful, I inevitably reached a point where it was up to me to determine how best to use the tool. The beauty of Tinderbox for me is that even when I thought I knew what I wanted, Tinderbox was flexible enough to accommodate my sometimes messy thought process. My bias is that it’s a great tool for identifying connections that you might have missed, sometimes weeks or months after initially entering the data. Instead of tutorials, I would like to see more use-case scenarios in some categorical fashion. I also realize that this is easier said than done. However, I am always looking for ways to make connections so reading a use case about composites would be great.