I’ve set up a Tinderbox file for annotations, and I’m trying to figure out an approach for color coding notes depending on the type of source material. I use three main types of source material, namely: articles (academic or news); documents (government reports or studies); and interviews.
A little background… When I annotate a file, I import into Tinderbox as a folder (that has the same naming convention of the original file) and contains notes for each annotation. IOW, if I annotate a news article titled “Dog Bites Man,” I would import a folder with the following naming convention: REN_2022_05_04-Dog Bites Man (“REN” refers to rendered - and the original, unannotated file would be ART_2022_05_04-Dog Bites Man.) The REN_2022_05_04-Dog Bites Man folder would contain discrete notes for each annotation based on that article.
Anyway, I’m trying to figure out the best approach for identifying and labeling these my annotated files as articles, document or interviews. My first thought was to change my naming conventions (e.g., REN_ART_[date] for article; REN_DOC_[date] for document; REN_INT_[date] for interview), create an attribute for file type with a list data type (i.e., for article, document or interview), and create code that would read the folder prefixes, and set values according to their folder prefixes, and then color-code the notes, accordingly.
I’m curious what the community thinks of this, and if there might be another, suggested approach worth considering.
Thanks!