and you would be right! Profuse apologies, I’d used ‘Command’ when I meant ‘Control’ in 3 places.
My last post above now fixed.
and you would be right! Profuse apologies, I’d used ‘Command’ when I meant ‘Control’ in 3 places.
My last post above now fixed.
thanks @mwra
unfortunately, it does not render the outcome i subjectively desired …
“highlighted text” in $Text
in the source note
$Name
of the newly created note (through splitting)$Text
of the newly created notewhat happens, though, is:
$Name
of the newly created noteit maybe that this is intended by @eastgate … but, unfortunately, it is neither what i subjectively expected nor what i subjectively desired (see goal above)
i’d love to remedy my subjective intuition and learn to understand the objective intent of how the split-function currently works.
Thank you
This all makes sense, but as you note is not a current feature.
I think the current split is close.
Current behaviour:
Aside, I think the selected $Text option makes no sense here as the source text’s remainder now doesn’t make sense as an inline part is missing.
You want:
Aside, if $Text is selected, I’d have expected only that $Text to in the new note, with it being retained.
This begs the question of whether the feature needs modifying or a separate feature needs adding. I don’t have a settled view on that, if only because it isn’t a feature I use with any regularity and regular use is where the sharp edges of a feature come to the fore.
thanks, @mwra! you making it crystal clear when you summarise it:
What do you say @eastgate in light of the following consideration from Mark?
I would very much like to see this feature added, as it would spare one the effort of having to insert delimiters into a text beforehand, which would then need to be processed using the explode feature.
I’ll look into this
thanks @eastgate