Exporting the same data different ways
The key to understanding this is that notes only hold one export template ($HTMLExportTemplate). However, the Export: 'envelope and letter' technique offers a way around that.
But, you might say, in each case the root note (the top container of the cascade) already has an export template in stored to export its own per-note page. The workaround is to add a note to your document whose only task is ti ^include()^ the relevant container using the relevant âenvelopeâ template that in turns calls the cascading template for the included children/descendants. If you doubt this bear in mind this big page (designed for generating PDFs) is produced via a single enveloper-and-letter export of aTbRefs content via an ^include()^. If you donât believe me, you can download the a zip of aTbRef source TBX file and see for your self.
Formats
You give rather a range of those which have varying degree of support. Tinderbox doesnât export PDFs. You can export to Word or RTF/RTFD, but not using the template based method. Why? Because that is intended for those who find the template based export (originally HTML export) âtoo hardâ. You could âHTMLâ export to HTML or Markdown and use a command line (CL) tool like pandocâ .
With formats, why do you need format X? Is it because some other process will accept only X, or is it simply a casual assumption that you are used to, in the past, using format X? Put another way, if format X is difficult to generate (or you lack the skill/interest to do so) might some other format serve equally well. In context, my view of Markdown has shifted because of its value as a solid format for ⌠format interchange. In the early 200s people laughed at the âcomplexityâ of JSON for data because âCSV is just fineâ. Pitch a CSV solution now andâexcept for working with really old systemsâthe room will laugh at you for not using JSON. So, norms change and our expectations of âmust useâ need to move accordingly.
Multiple scope+formats
Possible but youâll likely want one envelope/letter cascade for each output format. So, if you want the whole doc exported in three different formatsâ*using Tinderboxâthen youâd need 3 containers with ^include^ each using different templates/export configuration. That works prompts the question do you need Tinderbox to do this. You could, for instance, make a well-formed HTML exported page. In word, import and save as a DOCX. Print the DocX to PDF. You now have 3 formats. Were it me, Iâd dump formats i donât need and take the path of least effort to make those I do.
A different reading of the question
If may be you assumed all the formats were built-in button-press options, in which the short answer is, they arenât and whether it is worth generating every one using Tinderbox alone is a judgment call only you can make.
â . N.B. This is not included in macOSâs default set of CL Unix tools. It is not complex to install but you might need to ask for help if youâve not installed CL tools before. There is no one tool/process for this, which is why you might need guidance the first time.