I’ve started using Tinderbox 10 (10.0.1) as a single place where I can digitize all my handwritten journals from the late 80’s onward, either by scanning in pages or actually typing in the text by hand.
I’ve already transcribing a few years worth of entries into an outline using a year|month|day hierarchy. Each day gets its own note and the title of each note has the date (mm/dd/yy) and some tags (2005-goals, software-designs, jobs, etc.) for later searching, analysis, word cloud, etc.
I haven’t thought much beyond data entry right now but I think eventually it might be nice to have a map view that shows all my notes across months and years in a single view. Manual and automatic links between notes with similar tags might be nice. Notes with similar tags having similar styles might also be helpful. (Note: I’m still exploring the Tinderbox feature set so there might be other interesting views and automations I can put in place down the road.)
But having fooled around with the Map view a bit I think the current hierarchical structure I’m using might limit having my single birds-eye map view since the year|month|day outline I’m working with seems to “wall off” notes at higher levels, i.e. at the year level you can’t see monthly notes unless you drill down into individual boxes.
Since each note has a title that contains the date (mm/dd/yy), would it be better to just have a single list of individual notes without the year|month parent nodes?
Also, is it better to put dates and tags in one or more of an individual note’s fields rather than concatenating them in the title? Or should the titles remain the same but the date and tag data also be put into note fields?
I know I’m just beginning this project and have just scratched the surface of Tinderbox 10 but I’d really like to not start with a structure that might limit future visualizations, automation, and analysis. So if anyone has any other suggestions please feel free to comment.


