I just reviewed the recording of the Tinderbox meet-up from yesterday (14 feb 2026) on the opportunities and barriers of tinderbox for non-technical people and women. It was a very thought provoking session. I could not join the session because I am on the other-side of the world and it was already after midnight here, when the session started.
I am a surgeon with academic and research interests. I First new about Tinderbox aabout 18 months ago. I can see th immense potentional of Tinderbox and is my favourite program. However, I have seen the barriers to using it. I will outline the barriers I have seen:
-
The UI (appearance) could be updated to resemble other modern programs. I find this is a issue when I try to introduce my colleagues to Tinderbox.
-
Tinderbox and Obsidian are powerful. However, one can easily spend more time customising both of them, then actually usuing them. Best to just use the basic features and be productive; then later on slowly trying to get the most of the software.
-
Opening the various pallete windows are not intuitive.
-
Some times get the feeling colours are not what thet should be. Red looks more like brown.
-
The action code is more like macro; for those who come from some programming background it is a challenge to get the get around the action code
-
There should be widgets with built in action code that you can install for addition functions (e.g.a widget for the highlighted texts in different notes to be pulled into a new note and have backlinks)
-
Adding images and videos should be similar to Obsidian. You add an image to a note. The image autoatically gets put into a subfolder and the image is linked to the file. Re-sizing the images should also be easier.
-
Simple, short video tutorials on the basics of Tinderbox would be usef (similar to what Adobe has now done for Adobe Captivate)
-
After 18 months, I still donot have a grasp out how to output from Tindrbox. I hear Pandoc but, have now seen a video on hos pandoc works with Tinderbox (I am sure there is already a video on this).
-
When I come back to tinderbox after 2 or 3 weeks, I am back to basics. They relearn again (happens with most software that are powerful)
I think there should be two-tier Tinderbox. âTinderboxâ and âTinderbox Proâ. The Tinderbox just having mapview and outline view and Pro version being the current version. So, non-technical people can start on the âTinderboxâ (should be cheaper or even free) ad the once they like the âTinderboxâ they can purchase the âTinderbox Proâ. For many of my friends and colleagues, the current Tinderbox is too complex (âaircraft carrierâ) and expensive for what they might be able to get out of it.
The tbx community is fab! It is the main reason why I am still with tbx and confident I will progress with tbx! Thank you all!
These are few of my thoughts from using tbx.




